On Thursday 14 June 2001 23:10, you wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:52:20PM -0400, Smitty wrote:
> > Thank you, Isaiah, you verified my statement about many californians near
> > the beginning of this thread: If you point out the situations around
> > them, they will persecute and alienate you. Thanks for demonstrating it
> > for us.
>
> I'm not a resident of California, stupid. I just moved here.
Well, you fit in. You have found your element. Again, you demonstrate
my point.
Smitty
>
> --->
> From lug-owner@mojo.ncsu.edu Wed Jan 24 20:22:38 2001
> Received: from milliways.datastacks.com
> (IDENT:qmailr@milliways.datastacks.com [216.254.102.16])
> by uni00ml.unity.ncsu.edu (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f0P1MX103068
> for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:22:33 -0500 (EST)
> Received: (qmail 12454 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2001 01:22:29
> -0000 Received: from milliways.datastacks.com (pjones@216.254.102.16) by
> milliways.datastacks.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2001 01:22:29 -0000 Date: Wed,
> 24 Jan 2001 20:22:28 -0500 (EST)
> From: Peter Jones
> To: lug@mojo.ncsu.edu
> Subject: Re: Who keeps order on this egroup? (fwd)
> Message-ID:
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> X-Archive-Number: 200101/132
>
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Smitty wrote:
> > This is evidently an unmoderated list. I asked a civil question to
> > an announcement made, got into a civil discussion with another list
> > subscriber, and one Peter Jones invalidates one of us (it is not
> > clear who) for doing so. Is Peter Jones an anti-social personality
> > or is he a little punk who needs to grow up?
>
> Undermoderated list: Amazing how somebody can argue against government
> and for mailing list moderation all in the same thread...
> Anti-social personality: One might argue that I have one, but arguing
> that I am one is goign to be a bit of a stretch
> A little punk who needs to grow up: Ye gods, I hope so.
> Unclear: I don't think so, no...
>
> And just to prove my immaturity: What's an egroup?
> --
> Peter
>
> When in doubt, debug-on-entry the function you least suspect has
> anything to do with something.
> <---
>
> I'll second that statement: Amazing how somebody can argue against
> government and for mailing list moderation all int he same thread.
>
> No matter *WHAT* you say, I'm going to think about that thread. Double
> standards and all. ;)
>
> > Smitty
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:10:29 EDT