I would argue that Shrek had that in Shrek's character. Certainly not
the other characters, but a _lot_ of work was put into Shrek. When I
watched it, I caught most of the facial expressions that Mike Meyers _uses_
in movies and stand up.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 07:00:53PM -0400, Smitty wrote:
> Pretty realistic animation. However, even though the bodies looks realistic,
> they do not look ALIVE. They appear more like walking corpses than real
> people. They all have a blank look - no vital force or spirit there. That
> is one attribute that cannot be put into animation.
> Smitty
> >
> > Being way light hearted herer, maybe the agents have been watching a
> > bit too many Jackie Chan movies, Hmm? One interesting poin, however,
> > that this brings up is the following: Have any of you guys seen "Final
> > Fantasy"? Have you seen how realistic those animations are? How long
> > before fake surveilance tapes start popping up in court rooms like
> > doctored pictures?
> >
> > If you want an example of the realism, check out shots like these:
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Server/9029/ffpics/06.jpg
> > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Server/9029/ffpics/37.jpg
> >
> >
> > The page source is the following:
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Server/9029/images4.html
> >
> >
> > Good images, but damn frightening technologies. What happens if they
> > start doctoring thing over, say, in Ybor? I know the tech's not QUITE
> > there, but as you can see from the photos, it's getting damn close.
> >
> > What do y'all think?
> >
> > norb
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
- Isaiah
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:22:10 EDT