Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v.	Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?
From: John Pedersen (john@jmp-systems.com)
Date: Thu Sep 09 2004 - 00:35:18 EDT
- Next message: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Previous message: Bryan J. Smith: "{SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - In reply to: Bryan J. Smith: "{SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Next in thread: Paul M Foster: "Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Messages sorted by: 
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
 
Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> Paul M Foster wrote:
> 
>>I'll disagree here. The key to any economy is productivity. The Fed can 
>>act as a brake or a stimulus, but producitivity is what drives any 
>>economy. The problem in this society is that too much of the wealth 
>>vests in the hands of too few _who produce too little_.
> 
> 
> Who do you _think_ has the money?
> The Fed is a _private_ corporation.
> It's interesting to research it.
I think it's very misleading to say that the Fed is a private 
corporation--in fact, it's an extreme stretch.  I don't see how you 
can say you researched it, if you think it's the same as a private 
corporation.
> Otherwise, your statement is typical of a socialist agenda.
> Eat the rich.  Blame the rich.
> They don't deserve it, because they don't work for it.
I think you're putting words in Paul's mouth.  And your spin leads 
into a discourse that doesn't have much to do with his original point. 
  IMHO.
John
- Next message: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Previous message: Bryan J. Smith: "{SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - In reply to: Bryan J. Smith: "{SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Next in thread: Paul M Foster: "Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Messages sorted by: 
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 
: Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:56:37 EDT