Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?

From: Bryan J. Smith (b.j.smith@ieee.org)
Date: Fri Sep 10 2004 - 12:43:41 EDT

Next message: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
Previous message: Levi Bard: "Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
In reply to: Levi Bard: "Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
Next in thread: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 12:23, Levi Bard wrote:
> Old news.

I was just stating if for people that maybe didn't know.
I'm new here so I apologize if this was already covered before my
arrival.

-- 
Compatibility and update matrix of Red Hat(R) distributions:
http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html
http://www.vaporwarelabs.com/files/temp/RH-Distribution-FAQ-4.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bryan J. Smith, E.I.                         b.j.smith at ieee.org

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:57:21 EDT