[SLUG-POL] Re: Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China
From: Bryan J. Smith (b.j.smith@ieee.org)
Date: Sat Sep 11 2004 - 08:41:44 EDT
- Next message: Levi Bard: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Previous message: John Pedersen: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - In reply to: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Next in thread: John Pedersen: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Re: Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all	over again, China"
 - Reply: John Pedersen: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Re: Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all	over again, China"
 - Messages sorted by: 
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
 
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 19:38, Paul M Foster wrote:
> You could be right. There's a movie that's frightening in a similar way, 
> called "Rollover". Kris Kristofferson and Jane Fonda. Except in this 
> one, the Arabs are the ones holding all the US money. Scared the crap 
> out of me the first time I saw it.
Unfortunately, the media and Hollywood assume it's the Japanese, Arabs
and now the Chinese that has "all our money."
Try the British.  It's simply history.
We own a lot of Japan in the same regard.
But you wouldn't assume so from the media.
-- 
Bryan J. Smith                                  b.j.smith@ieee.org 
------------------------------------------------------------------ 
"Communities don't have rights. Only individuals in the community
 have rights. ... That idea of community rights is firmly rooted
 in the 'Communist Manifesto.'" -- Michael Badnarik
- Next message: Levi Bard: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Previous message: John Pedersen: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - In reply to: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Next in thread: John Pedersen: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Re: Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all	over again, China"
 - Reply: John Pedersen: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Re: Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all	over again, China"
 - Messages sorted by: 
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 
: Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:57:37 EDT