Actually, the lines you quote below are not from my
system... they are from an example in the Advanced Router
how-to.
Doug
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 07:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
ter swartz <ter450@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Douglas,
> I get a headacke when ever I think of looking at
> protocol analizers, and I am not familiar with the
> output of your particular one, but I look at these
> particular lines:
>
> 3: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1400
> qdisc
> pfifo_fast qlen 100
> link/ether 48:54:e8:2a:47:16 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 4: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500
> qdisc
> pfifo_fast qlen 100
> link/ether 00:e0:4c:39:24:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> I am not certain, but wonder if your subnet is
> 255.255.255.255 (binary of ff:ff:ff:ff, using the
> "older" current TCP/IP protocol). I will forward this
> to some network gurus for some feedback.
> Pete
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:51:11 EDT