Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> >
> > ICANN is evil. Alternatives are good, but it still needs to be seen how
> > to successfully integrate them into the overall fabric.
> >
>
> Okay so they're self-serving and inept and evil. But how? Feel free to
> substitute links for explanations. I know very little about the subject.
Hi Paul,
Your best bet is to hit Slashdot and search for "ICANN". Any number of
past transgressions should pop up.
Make sure you follow the links shown and try to actually follow up.
Some of the "articles" seem fairly minor while turning out to be really
pretty awful, and some sound a lot worse than they really wind up
being. Although most of them make me sick to my stomach at how badly
ICANN handles their "power" either way.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- With Microsoft products, failure is not Derek Glidden an option - it's a standard component. http://3dlinux.org/ Choose your life. Choose your http://www.tbcpc.org/ future. Choose Linux. http://www.illusionary.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:07:26 EDT