Re: (FWD) Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?

From: Mark (mark@bish.net)
Date: Mon Oct 29 2001 - 14:37:52 EST


LWN is lwn.NET not lwn.COM

On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Glen wrote:

> Well, it looks gone now.
>
> Glen
>
> > > Tucows cut LWN loose last week, and returned it to Liz Coolbaugh and Jon
> > > Corbett, who started it, to run or not as they see fit, because of low
> > > ad sales. Michael Hall (from LinuxToday) and I have talked to Jon, and
> > > he's talking about going back to programming. "I never really thought of
> > > myself as a journalist," he says.
> > >
> > > LWN is up in air. From what I know of their readership figures, ad rates
> > > (in general), and LWN's cost structure, there is no way the site can
> > > make money without some radical changes.
> > >
> > > - Robin
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Mark Bishop (mark@bish.net) | Computer Engineer |
| 813-253-2197 | Network Engineer |
| http://bish.net | Embedded Programmer |



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:00:28 EDT