Mark wrote:
>
> Yeah, I wasn't concerned with the CPU but the network throughput. Are
> both boxen on the same network feed?
Yes and no. The web server is upstream, but the pipe into the web
server is huge so traffic to the web server shouldn't affect the mail
server at all.
> > Mark wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh Christ, you linked it to nks.com
> > >
> > > The list email traffic is going to take longer now.
> >
> > Nah, the list server and the web server are two different boxen.
> >
> > Besides, we're seeing 500 and 600 simultaneous connections on the web
> > server and still 'top' is reporting 90% CPU idle time.
> >
> > Sweeeet!
> >
> > (Although somewhat sad to say, the box is a 700Mhz Athlon with 512MB of
> > RAM. It would be much nicer to say it was a 486/66 with 16MB of RAM and
> > handling things that well. :)
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
$_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;$c=142;$t=255;@t=map
{$_%16or$t^=$c^=($m=(11,10,116,100,11,122,20,100)[$_/16%8])&110;
$t^=(72,@z=(64,72,$a^=12*($_%16-2?0:$m&17)),$b^=$_%64?12:0,@z)
[$_%8]}(16..271);if((@a=unx"C*",$_)[20]&48){$h=5;$_=unxb24,join
"",@b=map{xB8,unxb8,chr($_^$a[--$h+84])}@ARGV;s/...$/1$&/;$d=
unxV,xb25,$_;$e=256|(ord$b[4])<<9|ord$b[3];$d=$d>>8^($f=$t&($d
>>12^$d>>4^$d^$d/8))<<17,$e=$e>>8^($t&($g=($q=$e>>14&7^$e)^$q*
8^$q<<6))<<9,$_=$t[$_]^(($h>>=8)+=$f+(~$g&$t))for@a[128..$#a]}
print+x"C*",@a}';s/x/pack+/g;eval
usage: qrpff 153 2 8 105 225 < /mnt/dvd/VOB_FILENAME \
| extract_mpeg2 | mpeg2dec -
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/DeCSS/Gallery/
http://www.eff.org/ http://www.anti-dmca.org/
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/293/5537/2028
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:38:52 EDT