[SLUG] Re: LVM in installer? (fwd)

From: R P Herrold (herrold@owlriver.com)
Date: Mon Apr 08 2002 - 09:48:58 EDT


There was a question yesterday about Linux LVM -- this just
crossed the public beta testing list ...

-- Russ Herrold

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:43:27 +0100
From: Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Reply-To: skipjack-list@redhat.com
To: skipjack-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: LVM in installer?

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:12:19PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "JT" == Jay Turner <jkt@redhat.com> writes:
>
> JT> No, we have LVM support in the kernel, but it's still quite
> JT> fragile, so we don't have the option in the installer.
>
> Which is no big deal for me, but I do have to wonder what makes LVM
> fragile in Red Hat's (or your) opinion?

Just in the "pvmove" code I found two data corrupters and a deadlock.
I've fixed the problems I found, but the whole LVM codebase is
basically unmaintainable (even Sistina, the current maintainers, have
discarded it and rewritten LVM2 entirely from scratch.)

Cheers,
 Stephen

_______________________________________________
Skipjack-list mailing list
Skipjack-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/skipjack-list



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:56:06 EDT