Re: [SLUG] Slash vs PHPNuke

From: Russell Hires (rhires@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed May 22 2002 - 07:56:09 EDT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> I'm not necessarily looking for interactive content. But I think sites
> built with PHPNuke/Slash are tidy and clean looking. If the capabilities
> are built in, it might also allow some newsfeeds and such. The target
> site I'm thinking of is the SLUG site. Right now, it's built from mp4h
> and make, with template files and content files edited by hand.
> Content's fairly static, so refreshing the site is a matter of editing a
> file, running make and make rsync. But it would be nice if I could make
> a slicker site with less work (= prebuilt components). All the HTML on
> SLUG is hand coded at this point.

Well, there's also something called squishdot (a slashdot clone), which is a
Zope product. It's pretty well pre-built. I've never used it, but there is
information about it at http://squishdot.org...of course, you'd have to get
going with zope first.

Russell

- --
Linux -- the OS for the Renaissance Man
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE864dcAqKGrvVshJQRApt3AKDUeMlHhqHCUvBSof+c+MxMS/Du7QCg2G3U
0aXDG1zehwUu5bmvNr6A6rA=
=SDZN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:09:24 EDT