Re: [SLUG] runing X from remote console

• Next message: Mikes work account: "[SLUG] does anyone else have this problem with your posts,,, yes."
• Previous message: R.G. Mayhue: "Re: [SLUG] RE New Port Richey Meeting"
• In reply to: bpreece1@tampabay.rr.com: "Re: [SLUG] runing X from remote console"
• Next in thread: Mikes work account: "[SLUG] does anyone else have this problem with your posts,,, yes."
• Reply: Mikes work account: "[SLUG] does anyone else have this problem with your posts,,, yes."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 23:17, bpreece1@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
> what's with the attachments to all your messages?

I am not sure what you mean, but perhaps it has something to do with
your preferred mail client not interpreting my gnupg signature
correctly:

--
From: bpreece1@tampabay.rr.com
Message-ID: <001401c22177$0f638380$2f422041@myduron.tampabay.rr.com>
To: slug@nks.net
Subject: Re: [SLUG] runing X from remote console
Date: 01 Jul 2002 23:17:56 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
--
Does anyone else have this problem with my posts?

• application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

• Next message: Mikes work account: "[SLUG] does anyone else have this problem with your posts,,, yes."
• Previous message: R.G. Mayhue: "Re: [SLUG] RE New Port Richey Meeting"
• In reply to: bpreece1@tampabay.rr.com: "Re: [SLUG] runing X from remote console"
• Next in thread: Mikes work account: "[SLUG] does anyone else have this problem with your posts,,, yes."
• Reply: Mikes work account: "[SLUG] does anyone else have this problem with your posts,,, yes."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 13:27:28 EDT