Good Read. Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "btt" <btt@nethouse.com>
To: <slug@nks.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: New warning issue Re: [SLUG] sendmail problem - problem
corrected
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:03:22PM -0500, Patrick Grantham (at work)
wrote:
> > Now I when an email is received I not the following warning:
> > Dec 12 14:40:57 server1 sendmail[13579]: gBCJevQ13579:
> > from=<user@nonWorkingSite.com>, size=14648, class=0, nrcpts=1,
> > msgid=<01cd01c2a217$4fa92d70$4401a8c0@patrick>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA,
> > relay=[x.x.x.x]
> > Dec 12 14:40:57 server1 sendmail[13583]: gBCJevQ13579: forward
> > /home/lyngai/.forward.server1+: Group writable directory
> > Dec 12 14:40:57 server1 sendmail[13583]: gBCJevQ13579: forward
> > /home/lyngai/.forward+: Group writable directory
> > Dec 12 14:40:57 server1 sendmail[13583]: gBCJevQ13579: forward
> > /home/lyngai/.forward.server1: Group writable directory
> > Dec 12 14:40:58 server1 sendmail[13583]: gBCJevQ13579: forward
> > /home/lyngai/.forward: Group writable directory
> > Dec 12 14:40:58 server1 procmail[13584]: Enforcing stricter permissions
on
> > "/var/spool/mail/lyngai"
> >
> > By all observations, incoming emails make it to the mailbox, but I am
> > concerned about these just these warnings. Though not seen before the
> > procmail is of not much concern at this point. Even after I change the
> > permissions of /home/lyngai with chmod -R g-rwx and chmod -R o-rwx (just
to
> > be sure), the warnings still appear. What are your thoughts?
>
> There is a "Don't blame sendmail" configuration option that causes
> sendmail to be a little more lenient on some of the permissions
> of directories and files that it has to deal with.
>
> That particular setting has many different options, all of which are
> explained here:
>
> http://www.sendmail.org/tips/DontBlameSendmail.html
>
> This may be what you're looking for...
>
> Cheers!
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:11:16 EDT