Context: Differences between 98, NT, Win2K and XP seem fundamental -
different core OS, some file locations are different, Active Dir/No AD,
even different gui for some reason - these products don't seem to be
refinements of the previous product. I don't know many details (We're NT
shop) but it seems that some of the core design ideas are different.
When, say, RH (or anyone else really) issues a new Linux release, make
my day and tell me that they don't fundamentally change the product
framework like MS. I assume that the new version is fundamentally
unchanged and is a suite of newer/improved versions of existing
components as well as a different mix of "extra software". I feel sure
that this must be the case but I'd sure like to get confirmation from a
person more knowledgeable than I.
Thanks
-- John Clay Tallahassee
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:29:38 EDT