Re: [SLUG] about Knoppix Url

From: Steve (steve@szmidt.org)
Date: Fri Aug 29 2003 - 17:22:33 EDT


On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:17 pm, you wrote:
> Steve,
> When some one post to the list you do not personally carbon them!
> I did not personally send to you ! If you want to make this into your own
> little
> vent take it to the politics list. Do not email me directly!
>
> You obviously do not get it and want to make this a fight drop it.

I'm taking this off list as I've already spoken up against what I saw as a
personal stab and handle it there.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve" <steve@szmidt.org>
> To: <slug@nks.net>
> Cc: "savatage" <savatage@mindspring.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] about Knoppix Url
>
> > On Thursday 28 August 2003 07:03 pm, you wrote:
> > > I dont think you are following the Issue they are saying that they
> > > are having issues with Software Patents which could shut down the
> > > project!!!!!!! Follow the story not the links!
> >
> > I think you have fallen off the deep end. Whether or not I follow this
> > or any other issue is my decision and, has not thing to do with my post
> > of where you can get it. If you don't like my link ignore it.
> >
> > > Yes you can get to mirror sites but if Knoppix goes down then this
> > > could only be the beginning of may more to come!
> >
> > Probably quite true. And this has to do with the price of rice in
> > China?
> >
> > I'm sorry but I fail to see why it is your business to assume anything
>
> about
>
> > what I did or not. My post did not say Ignore The Issue! Follow My
> > Link!
>
> or
>
> > even imply it. It actually suggest further involvement.
> >
> > Some people here like the possibility to check out Knoppix. If you want
> > people to get with the Issue why not suggest it, based on whatever you
> > see fit. That would be more productive than telling me I need to get
> > with an issue which you have no idea of where I stand on.
> > --
> >
> > Steve
> > _________________________________________________
> > This sig is pending approval by SCO's legal team.
> > Licensing fee's expected to be "fair", i.e. $999.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
> > Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
> > posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> > official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
> Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
> posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.

-- 

Steve _________________________________________________ This sig is pending approval by SCO's legal team. Licensing fee's expected to be "fair", i.e. $999. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:06:32 EDT