{SPAM?} Re: [SLUG] *really* killing a process

From: Mario Lombardo (mario@alienscience.com)
Date: Fri Mar 12 2004 - 12:11:07 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bad news. Since the process' parent was INIT-5 (via "ps -ef"), I thought by
dropping into runlevel three it would go away. I was wrong. In fact, I
tried to go into runlevel one--still no go. Maybe if I ran INIT again??
Anyway...

In conclusion, I did have to reboot. I'm going to have to research how this
sort of thing happens and how it can be avoided. I'm hoping I won't need a
programmer's knowledge to make my discoveries.

/mario

On Thursday 11 March 2004 01:23, you as Mario Lombardo wrote:
> I'm trying to kill the following processes, first with no flag and then
> with -9
> They won't die. Why?
>
> 7328 ? D 0:00
> 7454 ? D 0:09
> 7602 ? D 0:08
>
> /mario
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAUe8y0rzDqf+VzP0RAkZIAKDibRmxtqyK/9QLGUz2lUlPtyGM1wCgjnlw
izCVBXAxX99XzEMELe12DOY=
=EqF9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:13:55 EDT