I use a linksys router and was planing on having an old linux box with
two nics convert CAT5 to thin net. So it would be after the firewall.
-Joey
Eben King wrote:
>On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Steve Szmidt wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Saturday 07 August 2004 08:04 pm, Joey Dale wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I just got about 200ft of coaxial ethernet cable (RG85) with N
>>>connecters, and would like to hook my buddy into my network (A reason to
>>>justify a 6/4 MB/s pipe).
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Running at 10MB might seem better than not at all, but I'd rather save
>>up the few tens of dollars to buy twisted pair technology, and run at
>>100MB.
>>
>>
>
>Well, the bottleneck would probably be the internet connection, not the 10
>Mbps NIC. Actually what was written was "6/4 MB/s"; I'm not sure what
>that means. 6 MB/s down and 4 MB/s up, B=bytes and b=bits?
>
>The other points are valid though.
>
>
>
>>I may have missed the jest of this story. Are you suggesting letting him
>>share your cable connection? In that case you should also do that AFTER
>>the firewall. Conectiong another cable box to the cable WILL be detected
>>by Brighthouse engineers.
>>
>>
>
>Sure, and it's much easier (and cheaper) to add a router than another
>cable box.
>
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 14:23:00 EDT