-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 06 November 2004 10:38, Paul M Foster wrote:
> I don't have Fort Knox sitting
> behind my firewall, and it's not worth it to me to configure things as
> though I do. It's a trade-off. I sacrifice some security for ease of
> use. I suspect most people approach it that way, good or bad.
I've always said "you don't spend $50,000 to protect a $5,000 diamond
ring".... Security is ALWAYS about compromises (heh- I made a pun)!
Good for you for recognising that basic tenet and adjusting your
security posture appropriately.
- --
"Solaris Unix" -- we don't do it because it's redundant, like calling a
dog a Dog/Beagle. A Beagle is-a dog, Solaris is-a Unix, and Linux is-a GNU.
Gary Lawrence Murphy in http://advogato.org/article/711.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Brian Coyle, GCIA http://www.giac.org/GCIA.php
iD8DBQFBjYUDER3MuHUncBsRAincAJ0STqK9zC73XBARKrS0WZYIzrcxvwCdEWol
L1XkzwqOnV73I0+hHwvJwuY=
=QQWz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:36:05 EDT