jeff wrote:
> I would just love to hear him explain why there are so many security breaches
> in their software if that is true. :) There were six SP's for NT4, 3 (or is
> it 4) for Win2K, at least 2 for XP. Considering that a large proportion of
> the patches in those SP's were for critical security issues, I don't see how
> their software could be considered secure. To quote Bugs Bunny, "What a
> maroon"!
>
In my world, there are no patches or operating systems from Windows
beyond Win2k SP2. Everything after that is "compromised" by the MS EULA.
Of course, I also have to deal with clients' worlds, and as such I still
have to deal with the occasional XP and Server 2003 system (or twelve,
or so). Ack.
-- Chad ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:55:46 EDT