On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 19:49, Chad Perrin wrote:
> There are better things to be offended/snippy/whatever at than the fact
> that some of us just aren't interested in trying Fedora out for
> ourselves any time soon.
Then do _not_ comment on it. That's the problem, people talk about what
they do _not_ have first-hand experience with.
And what does that result in?
People like myself are then in the "minority." Which means that
"majority assumption" seems to trump those of us in the "minority with
experience."
Which explains about 90% of what is said about Fedora today, because
that 90% is from people who have never used it, or never used it long
enough to understand anything they are saying.
-- Bryan
P.S. I could comment more (like why SuSE isn't as "commented on" as
much as Red Hat), but I won't.
-- Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@ieee.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- Subtotal Cost of Ownership (SCO) for Windows being less than Linux Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) assumes experts for the former, costly retraining for the latter, omitted "software assurance" costs in compatible desktop OS/apps for the former, no free/legacy reuse for latter, and no basic security, patch or downtime comparison at all.----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:13:46 EDT