Eric Jahn wrote:
> On Saturday 04 December 2004 03:27 pm, Paul M Foster wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 07:14:50AM -0500, Chad Perrin wrote:
>>
>>>2. Why is MySQL so much more popular than PostreSQL?
>
>
>>Because it has a company and marketing behind it. Really.
>
>
> ...and support, and now clustering. Clustering is now our Pee Wee Herman word
> of the day. Anyway, I was reading about Clusgres online, but it looks to be
> proprietary closed.
>
Wow. So, contrasted with the assertions to the contrary made by
PostreSQL devotees, each is much better than the other for certain
tasks. Thanks for the information.
-- Chad ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:15:59 EDT