I've used a couple of perl CMSs and tried many PHP CMSs. I've settled
on Geeklog. Besides an occasional security issue (that's usually
patched in a reasonable amount of time), it is a very good CMS. One of
these days Geeklog 2 will surface... can't wait to see the new features.
Logan Tygart wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 08:56 -0500, Russell Hires wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 01:24 -0500, Eric A. Hicks wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Russell Hires wrote:
>>>
>>>
><snip>
>Riddle me this...
>
>As a BOFH, with a good sized web server farm, I see things like this:
>
>Perl is/was the duct tape of the internet. Perl is excellent at parsing
>text and strings, but semi difficult for Web Creatures, who like to call
>themselves Webmasters, to comprehend and did not want to delve into the
>guts CGI.
>
>Python exists as an alternative, for the aforemention Web Creatures, who
>found PERL too difficult to comprehend as a language to parse their text
>and strings. Thus they use it, possibly unknowingly, as an alternative
>to PERL. Now they have Zope to use as a CGI.
>
>That said, why not use PHP? From my point of view, as a manager of Web
>Creatures, PHP was created to do web things that neither PERL nor Python
>were created to do originally. Most folk I have encountered who can
>grasp the complexities of either PERL or Python, find PHP a breeze.
>
>Possibly, this is an, "Ask /.," question, but I am curious to know what
>the local SLUG fiends have to say.
>
>The Logan
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:55:07 EDT