I actually have not had a problem with samba printer queues, maybe I
am just lucky. Windows XP Box with Epson R300m(photo stylus) shared
on network. OSX picks up on it just fine. NEC 870 Super Script and a
HP 3600 inkjet on this other machine Window/Linux/Beos/Freebsd shared
all with samba. each one gets alot of printing depending on what I am
doing. No problems. But spliting off the one usb printer to 3 others
machines via usb is not the smartest thing if your not the only one
using the machines. All that will do is confuse the printer if two
print jobs from two different machines come in at apoximate the same time.
So bottom line what I was saying is share the printers somehow via smb
or what ever else is out there and save alot of hassle and money on usb
cables.
Steven Buehler wrote:
> Mac OS X's underlying printer system is based on CUPS and it will
> automatically pick up any Linux printer queues if they are being shared.
>
> I would connect the laser printer to the Linux machine, and then let
> the Macs discover that queue (assuming they are all running some
> flavor of UNIX, i.e., Linux or OS X). You could also get a USB hub
> and connect the USB printers to the Linux box as well.
>
> If you have printers connected to a Windows machine, it's a whole
> other ball game (as I'm finding out with my Win XP Desktop that has an
> HP DeskJet 5550 and LaserJet 1012 connected, both by USB). The HP
> drivers for these printers in OS X only become active if the printers
> are directly connected to the Mac or available via JetDirect (in other
> words, they're not network capable). My work around was to install
> GhostScript and RedMon (which lets you set up virtual printer ports
> that send the input to a program) on the Windows machine and set up
> generic PostScript drivers on the Mac, and let GhostScript on the
> Windows side do all the rendering and printing. I also installed and
> enabled the LPD/LPR extensions to Windows XP (available in Windows
> Setup) so I wouldn't have to mess with SMB print queues (Windows and
> Unix don't get along that well printing over Samba).
>
> Steven Buehler | swbuehler@yahoo.com/steven@sanctuaryweb.org
> Personal Home Page: http://www.sanctuaryweb.org
> Instant Messengers: swbuehler (Yahoo/Skype/Mac iChat AV),
> StevenBuehlerFL (AIM), stevenwbuehler@msn.com (MSN Msgr.)
> Composed on an Apple iBook G4
> Qualify for a FREE APPLE IPOD: http://www.freeiPods.com/?r=9458651
> On Feb 12, 2005, at 9:02 AM, Robert Snyder wrote:
>
>> A2L1 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> There is a file and printering sharing wizard in OSX. IT uses
>> Samaba so the other machines can pick up on it just fine.
>> Called dont mess around with all that stuff when you can simply
>> network the printer. Networking the usb one you would not even need
>> to have it hooked up to the A/B switch as the pc could see the samba
>> share too.
>>
>>
>>> This is in a round about way just barely a linux problem, just
>>> barely anything close to linux but I really cant think of a better
>>> place to ask, the people on this list know a little about most
>>> everything related to computers running Linux or not.
>>> Ok, here is what I have going on. I have a lexmark E312 laser that
>>> has both USB and parallel. Presently I have the Linux box connected
>>> through an A/B switch to the printer and an HP 612 both on cable. I
>>> have a mac B&W running 10.3.8 connected to the printer with the
>>> USB. So far all is good and everything working fine. I want to
>>> connect 2 other mac B&W's to the printer. One is running Yellow Dog
>>> and the other Debian but the only connection possible with a B&W is
>>> USB. The question is -- Is there any way to connect all 3 macs to
>>> the USB so they can all share the laser? I have a couple of 4 port
>>> USB hubs but I cant see anyway to connect the macs to the hub and
>>> have the hubs share the printer, what am I missing?
>>> According to all the USB data I could google up there is no USB to
>>> USB cable -- they cannot be "networked" but can be "daisy chained"
>>> up to 277 from what I can gather. I would like to think there would
>>> be a way to connect these without running a print server, servers
>>> and I do not have a good history :(
>>> Thanks,
>>> A J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
>> Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
>> posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
>> official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
>>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
> Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
> posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
> official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:04:03 EDT