Re: [SLUG] threads trend (top vs. bottom replies.)

From: jeff (jdavis70@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Sun Aug 14 2005 - 12:48:32 EDT


On Sunday 14 August 2005 2:25, Pete Theisen wrote:
> patrick grantham wrote:
> > Threads on top when replying vs. threads on bottom. Lord have mercy, I
> > hope a standard comes out. The war between replying on the top vs.
> > bottom is giving a headache. Both have merit, I just wish one would win.
>
> Hi Patrick!
>
> Well, if no one trims and then someone bottom posts at the bottom of all
> that untrimmed thread, well!

 Even that is better than the people that snip everything and then reply. I
see that frequently on a usenet group that I am on. If you snip _everything_
and reply, no one knows who the reply was for or what the reply was about.
After all the confusion those posters create by doing that, they still can't
understand why the rest of the group then takes aim with their phasers set on
charbroil for a week. At least with the entire post quoted one can tell what
the topic is, even if it contains a lot of reduntant text.

Jeff
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:02:44 EDT