[SLUG] Linux Trademark enforcement in Australia?

• Next message: Chuck Hast: "Re: [SLUG] VFAT read, execute only... need write"
• Previous message: Sick Twist: "RE: [SLUG] VFAT read, execute only... need write"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Linus and Maddog enforcing Linuxmark in Australia.

http://theinquirer.net/?article=25529
http://www.smh.com.au/news/breaking/linus-backs-trademark-charge-says-maddog/2005/08/19/1123958221375.html?oneclick=true
http://www.smh.com.au/news/next/linux-trademark-protection-comes-at-a-cost-for-some/2005/08/15/1123957995044.html

While I understand what is going on, I fear the possibilities of what
_could_ happen here.

The big problem I have is with the trademark fee... is this purely for
funding the efforts of linuxmark.org, or something more.

http://www.linuxmark.org/

 - Ian C. Blenke <icblenke@nks.net> <ian@blenke.com> http://ian.blenke.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.

• Next message: Chuck Hast: "Re: [SLUG] VFAT read, execute only... need write"
• Previous message: Sick Twist: "RE: [SLUG] VFAT read, execute only... need write"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:20:40 EDT