> I put Spamassassin on my machine to deal with the spam issue (which is not
> severe, by "abuse@" standards, but still), and it doesn't seem to be getting
> beter. Correction, the two-week average of "% spams caught" has gone from
> 38% two weeks ago to 44% now. There have been no false positives, for which
> I'm grateful, but I'd put up with a few false positives for a better kill
> rate. I got fed up with it, so I made a spreadsheet to see _how bad_ it
> was. It's at http://24.94.123.65:81/spam.xls . I've fed every missed spam
> to it by "| sa-learn --spam" from pine. What am I doing wrong? Shouldn't
> it be improving?
When the command returns you should see a message saying the number of messages
processed and how many were used. If you get weird numbers, try specifying the
--mbox option to sa-learn.
-- * The Digital Hermit http://www.digitalhermit.com * Unix and Linux Solutions kwan@digitalhermit.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:52:37 EDT