On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 10:58 -0700, John Pugh wrote:
> > they were before. It seems (from googling) that the native kernel
> > channel bonding creates conflicts with samba/smb and afp services.
> > Anybody have any input on this? I'm still googling but it's like
> > looking for a needle in a hay stack.
> >
>
> This helped me a lot.. http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Bonding
>
> I'd take a look with ethereal on both channels...it quickly uncovered
> an inadvertant routing issue I created.
> I'm not using netatalk, but samba continues to run as good as it can
> considering it's smb.
>
> JP
Great document John! Thanks. It clears up a few mysteries and opens
some options including the mii tool that I wasn't aware of. I'm using
SuSE on our servers and it works great. What was the inadvertent
routing issue? Was it a default route or something being done by the
network init script? What capture options / filters did you set in
ethereal? Are you set up round-robin or tlb or alb?
Thanks again!
Mike Branda Jr.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:06:40 EDT