On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Paul M Foster wrote:
> Ken Elliott wrote:
>
>> I've tried this on several LCD monitors a few years ago and they failed
>> badly. Response was too slow. But I know they are much better today, and
>> I'd like to repeat the test. I only use CRTs (except for my laptop) so I'm
>> not in a position to try. The faster you move the image, the harder you
>> stress the display components.
>
> But is that because of video hardware or display software?
I know with laptop displays there's a difference between active and passive
matrix displays; presumably the same characteristic (I don't know what makes
the difference) applies to desktop LCD monitors.
-- -eben ebQenW1@EtaRmpTabYayU.rIr.OcoPm home.tampabay.rr.com/hactar TAURUS: You will never find true happiness - what you gonna do, cry about it? The stars predict tomorrow you'll wake up, do a bunch of stuff and then go back to sleep. -- Weird Al ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:32:58 EDT