Ken Elliott wrote:
>>> I prefer the GIMP anyway.
>>>
>
> Not me. GIMP is a great program, but simply doesn't compare to Photoshop. I
> use both, but for heavy lifting (16-bit Nikon NEF RAW files and HDR),
> Photoshop is without equal in the world. Wish it wasn't that way, since
> there is a lot to dislike about Adobe.
>
> That being said, I prefer the GIMPshop hack of GIMP. It's interface is a
> bit more friendly to Photoshop users. If you have to use both, or come from
> a Photoshop background, GIMPshop is much easier to use.
>
> Ken Elliott
>
>
Now that I can believe. Of all the image editing I've done, I've never
gotten into the whole heavy-line stuff like RAW and that sort of thing.
I've pretty much stuck to the amateur copy, crop, cut & paste stuff.
For that, the GIMP reigns supreme in my book. (especially for the price!)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 17:58:17 EDT