Re: [SLUG] Software and Morality (was Cheap'n good laptops for Linux)

From: Jonathon Conte (thesicktwist@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 14 2006 - 16:46:35 EST


>From: "Rich Morgan" <rmorgan@heavysystems.com>
>Reply-To: slug@nks.net
>To: slug@nks.net
>Subject: Re: [SLUG] Software and Morality (was Cheap'n good laptops for
> Linux)
>Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:06:26 -0500 (EST)
>
>I think you fall into a trap when you assign moral qualities to objects
>rather than activities. It might be more accurate then to say that
>*writing* proprietary software is immoral since you could be hurting other
>people with buggy code that they cannot fix or placing people in an
>unsecure computing environment they cannot make secure.
>
><snip>

Well said. Although, one might also argue that *using* proprietary software
is immoral since it fosters the mindset that proprietary software is
socially acceptable. It also sends the message to proprietary developers
that the my-code-for-your-freedom transaction is just.

Jonathon

_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live Spaces
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided as an unmoderated internet service by Networked
Knowledge Systems (NKS). Views and opinions expressed in messages
posted are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
official policy or position of NKS or any of its employees.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:28:49 EDT