On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 07:47:57PM -0400, Smitty wrote:
> False accusation. I have been giving you rationale but you refuse to
> comprehend and resort to invalidation.
"And you have only proven what I said" without a followup sentence for
cohesion is hardly syllogistic rationale. And I thought you were done
wasting your time with me? ;)
> REREAD what I wrote: I mentioned TWO books and then stated "to name a few",
> meaning there are other books.
> Whatever drug you are on may be impeding your comprehension.
It's a neurotoxin, found in the American Toxicology Report every year,
called caffeine. Your horrific punctuation must have distracted me.
> False accusation again. I know the difference between the two and the tactics
> are largely the same.
The tactics are minutely similar, and your assertion of my accusation's
falsity is only compounded by your lack of correct wordage in practice.
Wow, what sentence.
--
- Isaiah
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:14:56 EDT