Re: [SLUG-POL] True Story - example of the lunatic state of California

From: Smitty (76543a@mpinet.net)
Date: Tue Jul 17 2001 - 21:30:04 EDT


On Tuesday 17 July 2001 18:37, you wrote:
> [Smitty is odd, Herrold is even on indents]
>
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Smitty wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 July 2001 01:27, Herrold wrote:
> > > > There's nothing "dubious" about it. You have not provided any
> > > > evidence to refute anything presented in the posting under
> > > > discussion.
> > >
> > > Let's review the bidding -- Remind me, Smitty, again of the
> > > citation of the URI location where we might review the full
> > > context of your 'evidence'?
>
> Gee, Smitty -- missed seeing the link to the full text ...

If you want links, there should be one or more in the original posting and
you supplied links in your antagonistic reply. If you want more
documentation, you do the work.
>
> > > > I object to your advertising for them. [a MSN - Hotmail
> > > > account advert line]
>
> Object away -- this is one purpose of slug-pol
>
> > > Nice try at a switch into an ad hominium attack. I decline to
> > > be distracted, and await the citation requested above.
> > >
> > > Looks as though you got chased off a list in "lunatic state of
> > > California" ... SVLUG are a pretty tolerant group of fellows
> >
> > False accusation, Russ, I was unsubscribed because I refused to not
> > refute the socialist politics of Moen and Self.
>
> Gee, Smity -- don't believe I asserted that you were the
> victim of an involuntary 'unsubscribe'. If they unsub'd you
> after fair hearing, they were clearly not as tolerant as I
> might hope.

You did not. There was no hearing. No policy in a charter as a defense.
 
>
> > They are definitely intolerant of those who disagree with them.
>
> Me, I am less tolerant of people who quote endless text
> without trimming; of people who don't give a straight answer
> to a simple question; of people who launch tangential ad
> hominem attacks.

"Object away -- this is one purpose of slug-pol"
>
> > > -- I've lurked on the list on and off ... Seems that Rick Moen
> > > and Karsten Self were less tolerant of your antics:
> >
> > I object to your calling my making postings "antics".
> > Are your postings antics?
>
> As before, Object away -- this is a purpose of slug-pol

"...of people who don't give a straight answer to a simple question."
Russ Herrold the hypocrite.
>
> Thought I answered that before -- my posts here are in the
> role of a "Devil's Advocate" -- If antics are called for, fair
> warning that I certainly consider that a fair method of
> presentation.
>
> > Unnecessary, as he has not made any attempts to contact me. Thanks
> > anyway though, but if I need assistance in that area, I will ask for it.
>
> Just trying to be of help <grin>
>
> -- Russ



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:25:04 EDT