On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 06:12:41PM -0400, Smitty wrote:
> > So basically, Smitty, you thought you could walk in, act sauve, and
> > change people's minds?
> No, you are saying that.
Yes, I am saying that. Because you are acting like it. I'm asking a
question, you've provided an answer, and your answer kookily (I love that
word!) conflicts with your behavior.
> > Obviously you did, if you approached it from the procedure you outlined
> > above. If you contribute to <blah>, you're allowed to screw around on
> > it. Everyone knows it, everyone is happy.
> Who is everybody? You are speaking in generalities.
All participating members of the situation, that being, active SVLUG
contributors. "Everbody" is obvious, and you're trying to take the focus
off your behavior.
> > It's not arbitrary, and going right to the top of the food chain
> > without any support is stupid. Marc is a great guy, and very
> > reasonable.
>
> I disagree.
And you lost! Coincidence? I think not! You've never played any
strategy games, have you? ;) And Marc *IS* a great guy, and *IS* very
reasonable. I've met him, have you?
> > > Assumed identities are not identical. You may be referring to the NCSU
> > > list where I did not care to deal with the offtopic socialist politics
> > > and unsubscribed myself. You are in no position to publicly evaluate my
> > > conduct, Paul. I would suggest a discussion off-list for your own sake.
> >
> > Sounds like a threat to me. You know that's against the law, right
> > Smitty?
> Where's the threat? Please cite the law you are refering to. If you cannot
> cite the applicable law, knock off your b.s.
"I would suggest a discussion off-list for your own sake." If you
haven't figured it out yet, what the law says is irrelevant. It's how its
interpretted that counts. I myself took what you said as a threat against
Paul's wellbeing. I'm sure any rational person would.
> Smitty
--
- Isaiah
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:25:59 EDT