I thought the topics were fine, the writing was poor (and therefore
editing), and there was little to zero conveyance of a sound understanding
of the content. I suppose I should look at it now and see if the same
complaints are applicable.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:15:09AM -0500, Paul M Foster wrote:
> Well, if not specifics, what about generalities? Technically inaccurate?
> Too high-level? Too low-level? Poor writing? Uninteresting subjects?
>
> I've heard other people complain about LJ, but I haven't seen a real
> change. Part of the problem there is that my overall understanding of
> Linux has changed, so I'm not looking at them from the same viewpoint as
> when I started taking the magazine.
>
> Paul
--
- Isaiah
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:06:36 EDT