Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?

From: Levi Bard (taktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktak@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 10 2004 - 10:41:01 EDT

Next message: Levi Bard: "Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
Previous message: Mike Manchester: "Re: {SPAM?} Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
In reply to: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
Next in thread: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
Reply: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> You could be right. There's a movie that's frightening in a similar way,
> called "Rollover". Kris Kristofferson and Jane Fonda. Except in this
> one, the Arabs are the ones holding all the US money. Scared the crap
> out of me the first time I saw it.

Is this the one where he gets into sword duels with vampires?

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:57:03 EDT