Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?
From: John Pedersen (john@jmp-systems.com)
Date: Sun Sep 12 2004 - 05:03:59 EDT
- Next message: John Pedersen: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Previous message: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - In reply to: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Next in thread: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Reply: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Messages sorted by: 
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
 
> For example, the cash for most transactions in this economy do not come
> from the refinancing of property. At the consumer level, cash mostly
> comes from salaries, which arise from production of one sort or another. 
But the point is that soaring personal debt is what is keeping the 
economy "healthy" (by your definition; ie. buying and selling). 
Without the increasing personal debt, you would be seeing your 
precious "Paul's Buying and Selling Index" economic indicator falling, 
falling, falling....
I think you must be the last person in America who hasn't heard about 
increasing levels of consumer debt and each year we set new records in 
personal backruptcy.  Next year will see even worse figures, and the 
next year will be worse....  That's what happens when you ship jobs 
oversease, and discard your manufacturing base that has been 
responsible for America's rapid rise for the past couple of hundred years.
The government whose figures you trust so much has been feeding the 
increasing debt by injecting almost interest-free money into the 
system, for several years now, so that people could add to their debt 
by refinancing their houses, etc.  Maybe you haven't heard about that 
either.
You reject the complex data out of hand, and you reject simplified 
examples, so there ain't much left to say.  I won't waste more time on 
consumer debt.  You might want to try a really neat web site called 
Google.com, and search for information on "increasing consumer debt" 
or something like that.
- Next message: John Pedersen: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Previous message: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - In reply to: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Next in thread: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Reply: Paul M Foster: "Re: [SLUG-POL] Facist economic model, wealth v. income, Jackson v. Bank all over again, China -- WAS: one-sided political figure jabs?"
 - Messages sorted by: 
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 
: Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:57:53 EDT