by claiming their copyrighted code was used in parts of the kernel.
I think they could even make a case for saying that if someone only SAW the
code their ideas for the kernel came from MS code and ideas
On Sunday 13 May 2001 22:06, you wrote:
>
>
> thats very interesting. i didnt realize that microsoft could
> actually do that. the Linux kernal is not microsoft product.
> so how could microsoft sue. give me some details.
> thanks
--Seth seth@hollen.org
Lottery: The excitement of bad math.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 19:23:15 EDT