The first thing that caught my attention was the installation routine...
Now that is slick! I think both KDE2 and GNOME should look at that. It
would make installation and updating a painless task. On the downside
it's application packages that come with it are a bit slim.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Paul W Weinstein
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:32 PM
Subject: RE: [SLUG] Ximian..
I downloaded Ximian today. It is very slick, but I just like the look
feel of KDE2. That is my two cents worth.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of patrick
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Ximian..
On Thursday 07 June 2001 10:30 pm, you wrote:
> Well.. I ran xvidtune and it seemed to do the trick I have yet to
> to Linux so I can't say if it's permanent :) I will let you know. But
> anyways.. I checked out the Ximian website and was wondering, has
> tried Ximian? If so, what are your thoughts. How much different is it
> than from the vanilla version of GNOME.
What are the positive points on
> Ximian \
its under development :)
and what are the negative aspects of it.
its not anyway nearrly as polished as kde
> Also, is it safe to run the online installer that Ximian can be
> installed from?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:17:54 EDT