FUD...that's the best you can come up? ... all you supply is acronymic
babble.
"FUD" would imply that my comments are in defense of one system and to
discredit another -- nothing could be farther from the truth. I do believe
,though, it is very narrow-minded to bash one system without admitting the
flaws of another.
Oh, and I think Picard was a better captain.
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: R P Herrold [mailto:herrold@owlriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 2:34 PM
To: 'slug@nks.net'
Subject: RE: [SLUG] Insight on Code Red II
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Miller, Matt wrote:
> >FUD, pure and unadulterated ...
> Current code, sure...but for how long?
More FUD; life and security are processes, not destinations.
-- begone Troll ...
> Received: from exindav02 (mail1.expanets.com [12.109.240.30])
> by cloven.nks.net with SMTP id OAA08166
> for <slug@nks.net>; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from 10.21.1.104 by exindav02 (InterScan E-Mail
> VirusWall NT); Thu,
> 09 Aug 2001 13:20:08 -0500
> Received: by ec01.expanetscorp.com with Internet Mail Service
> (5.5.2653.19)
> id <P5QAX1Z7>; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:23:30 -0500
> Message-ID:
> <DBEF71F7E140D51196850002B30A27B801011533@EXFL01EM01>
> From: "Miller, Matt" <Matt.Miller@expanets.com>
> To: "'slug@nks.net'" <slug@nks.net>
> Subject: RE: [SLUG] Insight on Code Red II
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:24:23 -0500
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 18:59:00 EDT