I think that Linux.com should be more like Linux.org: more about Linux in
its permutations, rather than what it is now (a mishy-mashy
Linuxdoc.org-lite, mixed in with cute graphics). I guess I would like it to
be more "hard-core," though I confess I don't know what that would look
like.
What to include? More about the distributions. Maybe even reviews of the
smaller distributions. There's a lot about the smaller distros that no one
really knows.
I don't know what I would leave out, since it's got some good stuff. I would
probably change some of the fonts and such, by making the fonts smaller. The
larger size font makes it seem that there is a lack of content!
HTH
Russell
____________________________________________________
"I don't care if you're going nowhere,
Just take good care of the world."
-- Depeche Mode
----------
>From: Robin Miller <robin@roblimo.com>
>To: slug@nks.net
>Cc: cfgeeks@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?
>Date: Sat, Oct 27, 2001, 10:04 AM
>
> If you had a chance to decide what should and should not be on
> Linux.com, what would you include? What would you leave out?
>
> - Robin "Roblimo" Miller
> Editor in Chief, OSDN
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 15:55:03 EDT