Russell Hires wrote:
> I think that Linux.com should be more like Linux.org: more about Linux in
> its permutations, rather than what it is now (a mishy-mashy
> Linuxdoc.org-lite, mixed in with cute graphics). I guess I would like it to
> be more "hard-core," though I confess I don't know what that would look
> like.
>
> What to include? More about the distributions. Maybe even reviews of the
> smaller distributions. There's a lot about the smaller distros that no one
> really knows.
>
> I don't know what I would leave out, since it's got some good stuff. I would
> probably change some of the fonts and such, by making the fonts smaller. The
> larger size font makes it seem that there is a lack of content!
>
> HTH
>
> Russell
>
> ____________________________________________________
> "I don't care if you're going nowhere,
> Just take good care of the world."
> -- Depeche Mode
>
> ----------
> >From: Robin Miller <robin@roblimo.com>
> >To: slug@nks.net
> >Cc: cfgeeks@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?
> >Date: Sat, Oct 27, 2001, 10:04 AM
> >
>
> > If you had a chance to decide what should and should not be on
> > Linux.com, what would you include? What would you leave out?
> >
> > - Robin "Roblimo" Miller
> > Editor in Chief, OSDN
David wrote:
How about yourname@linux.com email? It would be a great marketing oportunity
for Linux.com!
Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 15:55:20 EDT