(FWD) Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?

From: Paul M Foster (paulf@quillandmouse.com)
Date: Sun Oct 28 2001 - 14:06:41 EST

Next message: Patrick Grantham: "Re: [SLUG] Test - Ignore"
Previous message: Paul M Foster: "[SLUG] Test - Ignore"
Next in thread: Ed Centanni: "Re: (FWD) Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
Reply: Ed Centanni: "Re: (FWD) Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 10:04:11AM -0400, Robin Miller wrote:

> If you had a chance to decide what should and should not be on
> Linux.com, what would you include? What would you leave out?
>
> - Robin "Roblimo" Miller
> Editor in Chief, OSDN

Capture as much LWN-type content as you can, since it looks like they're
not long for this world. It would be nice to have sections like they do,
on security, the kernel, desktop, etc.

Paul

Next message: Patrick Grantham: "Re: [SLUG] Test - Ignore"
Previous message: Paul M Foster: "[SLUG] Test - Ignore"
Next in thread: Ed Centanni: "Re: (FWD) Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
Reply: Ed Centanni: "Re: (FWD) Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 15:57:07 EDT