Re: (FWD) Re: [SLUG] What should be on Linux.com?

From: Ed Centanni (ecentan1@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Sun Oct 28 2001 - 22:54:40 EST


What makes you believe lwn.com "looks like they're not long for this
world" ? Aren't they a division of Tucows and affiliated with Time
Warner? I don't think Time Warner is on the ropes. Worst case, they'll
just sell it off to someone else. What gives?

Ed.

Paul M Foster wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 10:04:11AM -0400, Robin Miller wrote:
>
> > If you had a chance to decide what should and should not be on
> > Linux.com, what would you include? What would you leave out?
> >
> > - Robin "Roblimo" Miller
> > Editor in Chief, OSDN
>
> Capture as much LWN-type content as you can, since it looks like they're
> not long for this world. It would be nice to have sections like they do,
> on security, the kernel, desktop, etc.
>
> Paul



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 15:57:51 EDT