Re: [SLUG] 2.5 Kernels

From: Jason Copenhaver (jcopenha@typedef.org)
Date: Mon Apr 15 2002 - 10:08:22 EDT

Next message: Ian C. Blenke: "Re: [SLUG] Apologizes"
Previous message: Ian C. Blenke: "Re: [SLUG] Suse"
In reply to: Russell Hires: "[SLUG] 2.5 Kernels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

If your looking for stability stick with going back to the 2.2.x series..
The 2.5.x series is a development series.. which means it is almost
gaurenteed to break your system from one release to another =) (ok.. maybe
not that bad.. but close) ..

Jason

On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Russell Hires wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Has anyone tried any of the 2.5 kernels yet? I'm thinking about going in that
> direction, but I wanted to see if any has any advice to offer before I do...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Russell
> - --
> Linux -- the OS for the Renaissance Man
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE8usYaAqKGrvVshJQRAjnHAJ9R3hPN1iB8+55fHJ/OVbcBDY9mqgCfYJ/Y
> kZlkXE1YYGMmMhthq5Y10+M=
> =S/4g
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

Next message: Ian C. Blenke: "Re: [SLUG] Apologizes"
Previous message: Ian C. Blenke: "Re: [SLUG] Suse"
In reply to: Russell Hires: "[SLUG] 2.5 Kernels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:07:54 EDT