Re: [SLUG] Pathing limits conundrum - SLUG list server

From: John Danielson, II (jdii1215@comcast.net)
Date: Fri Jun 14 2002 - 13:51:53 EDT


Ken Billings wrote:

>John,
>As you can see from the headers of your last message, the SLUG list
>server can be _extremely_ sluggish delivering mail. Sending the message
>multiple times doesn't really help. ;)
>I asked Paul Foster about this a long while ago, but I don't recall the
>answer I got. Paul, can nothing be done about this?
>
>-Ken
>
>
>
>Received: from bart.nks.net (bart.nks.net [::ffff:216.139.204.164]) by
>mail.coffeehouseltd.com with esmtp; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:26:31 -0400
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by bart.nks.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian
>8.9.3-21) id LAA01981 for slug-track29; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:37:45 -0400
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Received: from homer.nks.net (homer.nks.net [216.139.204.172]) by
>bart.nks.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id LAA01978 for
><slug@lists.nks.net>; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:37:45 -0400
>Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2]) by
>homer.nks.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18152 for <slug@nks.net>;
>Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:37:45 -0400
>Received: from comcast.net (pcp885951pcs.puntag01.fl.comcast.net
>[68.56.203.220]) by mtaout03.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1
>HotFix 0.8 (built May 13 2002)) with ESMTP id
><0GXP00I82CPD2R@mtaout03.icomcast.net> for slug@nks.net; Fri, 14 Jun
>2002 11:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
>Date: 14 Jun 2002 11:38:49 -0400
>From: John Danielson, II <jdii1215@comcast.net>
>Subject: [SLUG] Pathing limits conundrum
>To: {SLUG} <slug@nks.net>
>
>
>
>
>
In future, will wait 24 hours before reposting, sorry (can scavange from
sent folder in Netscape 7.0 PR 1, which is what I did with the second
copy). What actually happened with the first post(which never appeared),
was that it got double-posted on LEAPList. Sheesh. Then I forwarded it
to SLUG, and got a mesage from Carson that appeared to have been sent to
SLUG as a post about 24 hours before it showed up, adn nothing else. So,
later, I tried sending it as a complete reedit just to SLUG to see if it
would post, and the server posted both. Prelim conclusion, the list
intake is being batched, with a bit of admin help. And will check a few
things myself-- what the heck is coffeehouseltd.com, through which the
list is going?????????

John.

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
Registered Linux User #276212, Machine #158988
"Use what works best for your needs, at minimum total cost of ownership."



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:38:14 EDT