John,
As you can see from the headers of your last message, the SLUG list
server can be _extremely_ sluggish delivering mail. Sending the message
multiple times doesn't really help. ;)
I asked Paul Foster about this a long while ago, but I don't recall the
answer I got. Paul, can nothing be done about this?
-Ken
Received: from bart.nks.net (bart.nks.net [::ffff:216.139.204.164]) by
mail.coffeehouseltd.com with esmtp; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:26:31 -0400
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by bart.nks.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian
8.9.3-21) id LAA01981 for slug-track29; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:37:45 -0400
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Received: from homer.nks.net (homer.nks.net [216.139.204.172]) by
bart.nks.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id LAA01978 for
<slug@lists.nks.net>; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:37:45 -0400
Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2]) by
homer.nks.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18152 for <slug@nks.net>;
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:37:45 -0400
Received: from comcast.net (pcp885951pcs.puntag01.fl.comcast.net
[68.56.203.220]) by mtaout03.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1
HotFix 0.8 (built May 13 2002)) with ESMTP id
<0GXP00I82CPD2R@mtaout03.icomcast.net> for slug@nks.net; Fri, 14 Jun
2002 11:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 14 Jun 2002 11:38:49 -0400
From: John Danielson, II <jdii1215@comcast.net>
Subject: [SLUG] Pathing limits conundrum
To: {SLUG} <slug@nks.net>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 20:38:09 EDT