Re: [SLUG] [Fwd: Majordomo results]

From: Smitty (a.smitty@verizon.net)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 21:19:01 EDT


Matt,
It is unfortunate this upset you, but nobody has been harmed by this
characteristic of majordomo, as far as I know. You should be far more
concerned about the anti-privacy laws rammed through Congress last year.
Now there is a situation to address.
Smitty
   
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 17:09, you wrote:
> Would anyone consider it a flaw that I can request status of list
> memberships of a another party's e-mail account from majordomo? I can't
> think of any real good reason other than simple privacy ones.
> I guess an example would be if I were a member of a majordomo list a
> little more risqué than slug.
> For example:
>
> domain @xess.com
> list a normal@xess.com
> list b deviants@xess.com
>
> I obviously don't mind people on the normal list knowing I am a member,
> but I might not like people on the normal list thinking I am a deviant
> as well (or vice-versa). Odd analogy, I know -- but it was the only one
> that I could think of at the spur of the moment. :-)
>
>
> -----Forwarded Message-----
>
> From: Majordomo@nks.net
> To: mmiller1@mptotalcare.com
> Subject: Majordomo results
> Date: 10 Jul 2002 16:46:33 -0400



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 13:38:09 EDT