On Thursday 11 July 2002 01:16, you wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 21:19, Smitty wrote:
> > Matt,
> > It is unfortunate this upset you, but nobody has been harmed by this
> > characteristic of majordomo, as far as I know.
>
> Upset me? Although I was soliciting some opinion, my e-mail was mostly
> rhetorical musing.
All right. I want to point out that the paragraph you wrote below looks like
upset to me.
>
> > You should be far more
> > concerned about the anti-privacy laws rammed through Congress last year.
> > Now there is a situation to address.
>
> What I should be concerned about would be MY concern, not yours. But
> thanks for pointing out my mixed-up priorities. I mean, what have I been
> doing responding or posting ANYTHING to the SLUG list when I could be at
> my representative's front doorstep demanding for my privacy rights!? (or
> at least sending an anonymous letter -- I want to maintain SOME privacy,
> right?)
>
> Sarcasm aside, I can form my own opinion, and I don't believe I was
> asking for yours -- specifically regarding any recent Congressional
> laws.
No, you made a general solicitation for response when you asked a question in
your original posting. It was actually the first sentence. I see you did
not like my answer.
Smitty
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 13:39:49 EDT