----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul M Foster" <paulf@quillandmouse.com>
To: <slug@nks.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] slugbay
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:49:42PM -0000, awyatt@fewt.com wrote:
> Anyway, this is a long way of saying that I don't really have a problem
> with the "I've got an X I'd like to get rid of", or "I need Y; anybody
> got one?" traffic. (If the officers disagree with me, we can have a
> back-channel discussion on the admin list.)
As being one of the Officers I agree with that view : )
> You also may not realize that there are actually six SLUG lists, all of
> which have to be administered. You normally don't see all these lists,
> but the list admins do. Adding more just adds to the workload. Moreover,
> on top of the almost 500 emails I get every day, I have to read every
> email that comes across all the SLUG lists, to ensure things don't get
> out of hand (which they sometimes do very quickly).
Hey what about that oppps never mind j / k .................lol
> Of course, I'm open to contrary arguments. All I'm saying is that in my
> opinion, new lists aren't really needed. I think the charter on the
> current SLUG list is flexible enough to allow this kind of traffic. And
> hopefully subscribers are tolerant enough to simply delete what they
> don't want to read, rather than screaming about it. But then, I've been
> wrong before. ;-}
Just not arguments like Monty Python's Argument Clinic skit .....lol
Gotta Love your Freedom :-)
Bill Preece
Freedom it's your choice, It's your right, It's ours to defend!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:07:52 EDT