I have definitely played those games ... WC3 is great, but
Conquerors is soo much better than WC2 that they are not even worth
comparing.
It must be the other way round ... you must not have played Conquerors
with the most recent patches.
And if by saying that the engine in AoE is boring, you mean the AI,
then you need to play humans (or me -- the machine).
The strategies in Conquerors are much more interesting than those
that developed in WC2 or Starcraft ...
WC3 is a different story (great game -- can i play it on my Linux box yet?).
Vernon Singleton
sanity wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 17:09, Vernon Singleton wrote:
>
>>If we could get Age of Empires playing on a Linux Box ...
>>AoE Conquerors is the only on-line strategy game worth playing, and AoM
>>will be better.
>>
>
>Are you kidding me? AoE was a sad, sad attempt of MS to take over the
>RTS market.
>
>Have you ever played Starcraft or Warcraft 3? Warcraft 2? Even Warcraft 1...
>
>The AoE engine was simplistic and boring. I remember buying that game
>and taking it back within a day. There was no strategy whatever! The
>unit/race balance was pathetic. Try Blizzard's excellent line of games;
>they're the original RTS master.
>
>--j
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
>http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:14:48 EDT